Quantum Tunneling Probability Calculator
Compute the transmission probability for a particle tunneling through a 1D rectangular potential barrier using standard quantum mechanics formulas (exact and WKB approximation).
Tunneling Calculator (Rectangular Barrier)
Results
For a 1D rectangular barrier with the parameters above.
Exact formula (textbook result). 0 ≤ T ≤ 1.
R = 1 − T (for a single barrier with no losses).
Exponential approximation valid for thick/high barriers.
E < V₀ → tunneling; E > V₀ → over-the-barrier transmission.
Controls how strongly the barrier suppresses tunneling.
How this quantum tunneling calculator works
This tool models a standard one-dimensional rectangular potential barrier of height \(V_0\) and width \(a\). A particle of mass \(m\) and energy \(E\) is incident from the left. Solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation with appropriate boundary conditions gives the transmission probability \(T\).
Case 1: Tunneling (E < V₀)
For energies below the barrier height, the wavefunction decays exponentially inside the barrier. Define
The calculator evaluates this expression in SI units (joules, meters, kilograms) after converting from eV and nm.
Case 2: Over-the-barrier transmission (E > V₀)
When the particle energy exceeds the barrier height, there is still partial reflection due to wave interference:
WKB approximation
For thick or high barriers, the exact formula simplifies to the WKB exponential approximation:
The parameter \(\kappa a\) is a dimensionless measure of barrier strength. When \(\kappa a \gg 1\), tunneling is extremely suppressed and the WKB approximation is very accurate.
Interpreting the results
- Transmission probability T: Fraction of particles that make it through the barrier.
- Reflection probability R: Fraction reflected back; for this idealized model \(R = 1 - T\).
- Regime: Indicates whether you are in the true tunneling regime (\(E < V_0\)) or above the barrier.
- κa: Larger values mean stronger suppression of tunneling.
Example: Electron tunneling through a thin barrier
Consider an electron with \(E = 1\ \text{eV}\) incident on a barrier with \(V_0 = 5\ \text{eV}\) and \(a = 0.5\ \text{nm}\).
- The calculator finds a small but non-zero transmission probability \(T\).
- Increasing the width to \(a = 1\ \text{nm}\) dramatically reduces \(T\) (roughly exponentially).
- Reducing the barrier height \(V_0\) increases \(T\).
This sensitivity to barrier width and height is why tunneling currents in devices like tunnel diodes and scanning tunneling microscopes are extremely sensitive to nanometer-scale distances.
Limitations and assumptions
- One-dimensional, single rectangular barrier.
- No dissipation, decoherence, or inelastic scattering.
- Non-relativistic Schrödinger equation (valid when \(E \ll mc^2\)).
- Applies to idealized textbook scenarios; real materials may require more detailed models.
Frequently asked questions
Is quantum tunneling really random?
In standard quantum mechanics, tunneling is inherently probabilistic: the theory predicts only the probability that a particle will tunnel, not which individual particle will do so. Over many trials, the observed frequencies match the calculated probabilities.
Why can small particles tunnel more easily?
The tunneling exponent \(\kappa a\) contains the particle mass \(m\). Heavier particles (larger \(m\)) give larger \(\kappa\) and therefore much smaller \(T\). Electrons tunnel relatively easily; protons and nuclei tunnel much less, which is why nuclear tunneling processes are typically very slow.
Can this calculator model double barriers or resonant tunneling?
No. This tool focuses on a single rectangular barrier, which already captures the essential physics of tunneling. Double-barrier and resonant tunneling structures require solving a slightly more complicated boundary-value problem with multiple regions.